The outcome of your Mann–Whitney U try shown statistically tall intercourse-relevant difference between this new respondents’ solutions for each and every of the analyzed comments on the answer shipping, having p place since the Desk 4 Mann–Whitney You https://www.datingmentor.org/nl/spiritual-singles-overzicht/ try on variable “sex” (2019)
The outcome of the Kruskal–Wallis try getting variables with an increase of classes indicate that, according to adopted assumptions one to p Desk 5 Kruskal–Wallis take to having variables: decades, host to quarters, studies, and you will distribution out of political needs on the right-left axis (2019)
Regarding most of the statements, there have been statistically significant correlations during the p Table 6 Spearman’s review-buy correlation out-of questions about sex, age, host to house, degree, and you will governmental tastes on the right-leftover axis (2019)
Supporters out of legalization out-of exact same-sex relationship compared the new declaration you to definitely marriage is only a love ranging from a woman and you can a man. A robust bad relationship (?0.66) are listed between the remedies for statements [A] and you will [B]. Along with, a top bad dependency (?0.62) are observed ranging from comments [B] and you will [C]. Those people respondents which considered that relationships try good commitment simply ranging from a woman and you will one don’t invest in render exact same-sex partnerships an equivalent liberties once the marriage ceremonies. A robust positive relationship (0.71) is noted ranging from comments [A] and you may [C]. A faltering confident relationship try listed amongst the distribution of your own respondents’ responses away from statements [A] and you will [D] (0.36) and you will [C] and you can [D] (0.36). not, in the case of the fresh answers off statements [B] and [D], a deep failing negative dependence try observed (?0.29). All listed correlations is mathematically tall with p Dining table eight Spearman’s review-purchase relationship (2019)
Regarding the eldest age group, 60.1% of your own participants compared, and you may % firmly compared report [A]. Inside ages classification, % of one’s participants shown assistance for report [A]. As well as the reduction of years, the newest part of participants contrary declaration [A] methodically decrease to the level regarding % regarding the twenty-five–34 many years group. Regarding youngest group, there is a small boost in competitors (to help you %), but in addition the higher part of supporters (47%) getting declaration [A]. Just in the youngest years group followers away from exact same-intercourse relationships outweighed its competitors, as well as the portion of people who had no thoughts about this point try the tiniest than the almost every other groups.
On youngest age bracket, from the % of females were and only legalizing same-gender partnerships, so there was indeed merely % of such responses certainly guys. Inside many years category, three times as much women due to the fact males shown good assistance to own statement [A]. Merely % of women about analyzed many years classification expressed strong resistance to declaration [A]; among men, so it feelings is actually shown by % of participants.
This new shipping from responses by place of residence shows that around have been statistically tall differences because of the size of metropolitan areas (Table cuatro). A low (%) service having report [A] are expressed by people from rural section (having farming-situated discount). Within class, there is the highest fee (%) of them not in favor of it statement.
Therefore, those individuals respondents exactly who defined its views just like the heart-proper, otherwise specifically right-side, and you may voted having proper-wing activities, was basically generally contrary to the legalization of exact same-intercourse unions
Degree of your participants are a statistically significant foundation (Dining table 5). A clear dating was discovered ranging from training and you can assistance toward declaration in question (rho = 0.21, p
Dialogue
The fresh need for the fresh new legalization from exact same-sex unions isn’t recognized from the almost all voters when you look at the Poland, there are unmistakeable variations in so it regard ranging from followers of personal events. The latest breaking up line out of support getting same-intercourse unions obviously distinguishes the new thoughts out of voters away from kept-side functions out-of people support right-wing of them. Those voters just who laid out its feedback given that remaining-wing or heart-left and exactly who served left-side events inside the elections were more likely to deal with exact same-sex registered partnerships.
